Professional Responsibility and Legal Ethics Wsu
Professor Melanie Kay is a lecturer and joined Colorado Law University in 2015 as Director of the Daniels Fund Ethics Initiative College Program at Colorado Law School. The initiative aims to help law students develop strong, principled ethical and professional identities through courses, experiential programs, and other practical opportunities. She is also co-director of Colorado Law`s Master of Laws Studies (MSL) in Ethics and Compliance. Professor Kay teaches a variety of legal ethics and ethical culture courses for JD and MSL students at the Faculty of Law. We will explore these concepts through legal case studies that illustrate the complexity that can arise when “obeying the law” can lead to difficult ethical dilemmas. In both scenarios, students may disagree on what to do “right” in the situation or change their minds as they learn more details about each case. In the final part of the course, students will consider applying the concepts to a business case scenario and finding ways to resolve future legal and ethical conflicts that may arise in their professional or personal lives. Complete ethics review notes with cases. Great and easy unit! Anyone with morality, ethics and common sense can pass! Description This topic examines the nature of the legal profession and its role in society. It addresses the professional, legal and ethical responsibilities that lawyers owe to the law, the courts, their clients and colleagues, as well as the state and society as a whole. Students are able to explain and assess the law and practice of legal practitioners in relation to key topics such as: professionalism; legal ethics; the history, structure and regulation of the legal profession; and the interpersonal, psychological and cultural factors that influence the practice of law.
In addition, students will be able to demonstrate the ethical decision-making process by selecting and using ethical decision-making tools in a legal context. Learn the concepts of law and ethics and better assess situations where the two may conflict. These concepts will be evaluated on the basis of legal case studies. Except in the performance of his or her official duties, an employee of the university may not assist another person, directly or indirectly, or for remuneration, in any transaction involving the State: (a) in which the employee has participated at any time; or (b) the operation in which the State is involved is or was under the official responsibility of the employee during the two-year period preceding such assistance. An employee of the university may not participate in the remuneration that another employee receives for assistance prohibited by law. For information on ethical issues, please contact the Ethics Compliance Advisor; [email protected]. (see BPPM 10.22). NOTE: Each policy or procedure mentioned may address only a limited aspect of the specified legislation. Participants will be introduced to the concepts of law, ethics and situations where the two can conflict. Many people confuse regulatory compliance with ethical behavior.
While this is sometimes true, there are many instances where compliance and ethics diverge. While compliance questions revolve around “What should I do?”, ethical questions focus on “What should I do?” This course first identifies cases where law and ethics differ. These include outdated or unfair laws, new or unregulated technologies, laws that touch on moral issues where reasonable minds vary according to personal values or beliefs, or the more complex variant where two ethical positions or values are opposed to rules. Provide comprehensive and detailed ethics opinions, with information on each topic covered throughout the semester. An employee with regulatory responsibilities or responsibilities for initiating university contracts has a stricter set of rules. See RCW 42.52.150(4). This section provides a brief summary of the applicable elements of the Washington State Ethics Act (RCW 42.52) and refers to related academic policies and procedures. Extensive Professional Activities, Faculty Handbook, Section IV. E An employee of the University may not receive any remuneration unless expressly authorized to do so by WSU and received it in accordance with applicable laws.
I graduated with honors in Economics and Management from UNSW and am currently a graduate. An employee of the University may not, directly or indirectly, accept, solicit or solicit gifts that appear to affect the performance or non-performance of official duties. Faculty Compensation Outside of Assigned Duties (BPPM 60.44) No person may give, pay, lend, transfer or deliver, directly or indirectly, anything of economic value to another person if receipt is a violation of RCW 42.52.040, 42.52.110, 42.52.120, 42.52.140 or 42.52.150. 5-6 hours of content and interactive learning tasks These notes are very detailed and comprehensive, providing simple explanations in English for all lega. These marks were for the final exam. These notes go straight to the point and define the structure when a year. The Ethics Act applies to all employees and executives of the university. An employee of the University may not disclose confidential information to unauthorized persons or use confidential information for personal purposes or for the benefit of others. Equivalent Topics 200020 Professional liability and legal ethics have not been an easy topic.
The final exam lowered my grades considerably. Electronic Communication Policy, Executive Manual EP4. A full description and interpretation of the law can be found on the Executive Ethics Committee website. Professor Kay joined Colorado Law after ten years of litigation experience. She primarily practiced environmental law with the non-profit law firm Earthjustice in Denver, Colorado. She also practiced general civil litigation at Latham & Watkins in San Francisco, California and Wheeler Trigg O`Donnell in Denver, Colorado. Immediately after law school, she served on the Ninth Court of Appeals for the Honourable Procter Hug, Jr. in Reno, Nevada. Professor Kay holds a J.D. from the University of California, Berkeley School of Law, a master`s degree in environmental geochemistry from the University of Montana, and a bachelor`s degree in earth sciences from Dartmouth College. University Procurement by Government Employees, (BPPM 70.15) Experienced tutor with domestic and international students, fluent in English and Mandarin. Mutt.
An academic employee may not require, give, receive or accept any remuneration, gift, reward or tip for the exercise or postponement of the performance of official government duties, except to the extent permitted by the state or by law. Dal Pont, Lawyers` Professional Responsibility, (Thomson Reuters, 7th edition, 2020) Policy on Paid External Service by Faculty Members – Consultation, Faculty Handbook, Section IV.